Skip to content
Home » Blog » Minnesota Republicans Endorsed a Navy SEAL. Then They Voted for a Sideline Reporter.

Minnesota Republicans Endorsed a Navy SEAL. Then They Voted for a Sideline Reporter.

💡

Key Insight: The asset underperformed in both parties on the same night

Three days ago we wrote that Republicans have banked the veteran advantage Democrats keep trying to build. Tuesday tested that in four states. A Marine and Navy SEAL with the Minnesota party endorsement finished thirty points behind a former sports broadcaster, and the veteran now facing the toughest Democratic challenge in the country is defending rather than attacking.

What happened in Duluth, and what happened in August

Adam Schwarze enlisted in the Marine Corps three weeks after his eighteenth birthday, which fell three weeks after 11 September 2001. After that he fought through the combat phases of Operation Iraqi Freedom with the 1st Marine Division. After Iraq he guarded American embassies. Then he won a promotion to officer and took a degree at the University of Minnesota. In 2013 he moved to the Navy and joined SEAL Team Three. He counts nine tours across some seventy countries.

That record is on paper, not just claimed. The Minnesota Star Tribune read his separation papers from both services. They list an Iraq service medal, plus an award given for ground or surface combat. So whatever else is arguable about the man, the uniform is not.

In late May the Minnesota Republican Party met in Duluth and backed him. He started at just under 39 percent of delegates on the first ballot. By the later ballot he was near 63. Michele Tafoya came second at about 32 percent. She is a former NBC sideline reporter, and she had the national Senate campaign chair behind her. So she took it to the primary anyway.

On Tuesday she beat him by roughly twenty-nine points. Unofficial state returns at about 90 percent of precincts had Tafoya near 52.6 percent. Schwarze sat at 23.9. Royce White, the 2024 nominee, took just under 11.

❝

It’s never happened in the history of the party.

— Adam Schwarze, weeks before the primary, on endorsed candidates losing

He was talking about the Minnesota Republican nod, which he said had never lost a primary. Then it did, and by a margin that leaves no room to argue about turnout.

63%
Schwarze’s share of Duluth delegates
24%
His share of primary voters
29
Points he finished behind

Wisconsin picked the Democrat who is not a veteran

Rebecca Cooke won the third district nomination with about 57 percent to Emily Berge’s 43. The AP called it at 9:21pm with roughly two thirds counted. Berge ran at her from the left, backed by local Democratic Socialists of America and Indivisible chapters. But Cooke had the DCCC’s Red to Blue nod from February and Bernie Sanders behind her. She had also raised $8.6 million since the start of 2025, against Berge’s $728,000.

Cooke has not served. But Derrick Van Orden retired in 2014 after 26 years in the Navy, most of them as a SEAL, and left as a senior chief. He ran unopposed on Tuesday.

So the seat Democrats most need now has a Republican veteran defending it. The Democrat running at him cannot answer on that ground. We flagged this on Sunday as the shape to watch, and it arrived. Cooke lost to Van Orden in 2024 by 51.4 to 48.6, under three points. Trump carried the district by eight. Cook Political Report still rates it a toss-up.

Money is the part that has flipped. Cooke outraised him across the cycle. Still, a bruising primary drained the edge, and late July filings put Van Orden at $4.6 million on hand against her $1.8 million.

⚠

Strategic Insight: the endorsement is the mechanism, and it broke

Our argument has never been that voters reward a uniform directly. It is that a service record opens the doors where campaigns are made: party committees, endorsing bodies, funding networks. Minnesota is the cleanest test of that anyone has run this cycle. It split in half. Schwarze got the door open and took 63 percent of a convention that had never been overruled. Then he lost the voters by twenty-nine points to somebody famous from television. The record bought the room. It did not buy the state.

Vermont elected a veteran to a race nobody can win

Gerald Malloy took the Republican nomination for Vermont’s at-large seat with about 77 percent to Mark Coester’s 22, on returns with nearly 60 percent counted. Malloy is an Army veteran and a defense contractor. This is his third run at federal office, after going at Peter Welch and Bernie Sanders in the last two cycles.

In November he will face Becca Balint, who ran unopposed and has never served in uniform. Every rating service has the seat safe for Democrats, and Balint won it in 2024 with about 62 percent.

Add Vermont and the pattern from Tuesday gets easier to state. Four states voted on Tuesday. Four veterans appeared on ballots. The only one who won something that mattered was Luke Bronin in Hartford, a Democrat, in a district his party cannot lose.

⚡ Fast Facts: veterans on the 11 August ballots

  • Adam Schwarze (R, Minnesota Senate): Marine then Navy SEAL, party-endorsed in May, lost the primary by about 29 points
  • Luke Bronin (D, CT-01): Navy Reserve intelligence officer, beat a 14-term incumbent by roughly 21 points in a safe seat
  • Derrick Van Orden (R, WI-03): 26 years in the Navy, mostly as a SEAL, unopposed and now the most endangered House Republican
  • Gerald Malloy (R, Vermont): Army veteran, won his primary 77 to 22 for a seat rated safe Democratic
  • Michele Tafoya (R, Minnesota): no service, raised about $5.3 million, more than the rest of the field combined
  • Rebecca Cooke (D, WI-03): no service, raised $8.6 million since January 2025, faces Van Orden on 3 November

What Tuesday did to the placement argument

On Sunday we argued that Democratic recruiting is finished as a problem, and that the gap left is placement. Democrats field 294 veterans and hold 19 veteran House seats. Republicans field 363 and hold 59. We said the difference happens after the filing deadline.

Tuesday complicates that in a useful direction. If the Republican edge were structural, a Marine and SEAL with the state party behind him would not lose a Senate primary by twenty-nine points to a broadcaster. The same forces that ate Democratic incumbents this summer are eating Republican veterans too: fame, money, and a restless base.

Where Republicans hold a real edge is narrower than we wrote. It is holding the seat already, and Van Orden is the whole case. He is not ahead because he was a SEAL. If he wins, it is because he took the seat in 2022 and spent four years building a donor base and a local operation on top of it.

📅 How the Minnesota test unfolded

Late May 2026
Republican convention in Duluth endorses Schwarze, about 63 percent on the later ballot; Tafoya takes roughly 32 percent and goes to the primary
22 July 2026
FEC filings show Tafoya with about $1.3 million banked, out-raising the rest of the Republican field combined
Early August 2026
Public polling puts Tafoya around 41 percent against Schwarze at 5
11 August 2026
Tafoya wins the nomination by roughly 29 points; Peggy Flanagan takes the DFL nomination over Angie Craig
3 November 2026
Tafoya faces Flanagan for the seat Tina Smith is vacating

The case that Tuesday says nothing about service records

Put it at full strength, because it is a serious objection and parts of it are simply correct.

Schwarze lost to a woman known across the state from a decade of Sunday night football. She had the national committee chair behind her and about $5.3 million raised. So any candidate loses that matchup. Convention delegates have never looked like primary voters, in any state or either party. So the gap between a room of activists and 370,000 voters is a fact about conventions, not a fact about veterans. Malloy won his primary. Van Orden holds his seat. Reading a lesson about uniforms into one bad night is the kind of overreach this site accused itself of on Sunday.

There is a harder version. Say a service record predicts a convention result and fails to predict a primary result. Then what we have measured for three years is what party insiders think voters want, rather than anything voters have said. Clearly, insiders believe the uniform works. That belief moves money, which is real. It is also a loop, and it survives contact with actual voters only sometimes.

We accept the first paragraph almost entirely and about half of the second. Tafoya was always likely to win, and a single loss proves nothing on its own.

What we will not concede is that Tuesday was ordinary. By Schwarze’s own account, an endorsed candidate in Minnesota had never lost a Republican primary before. He said it in the weeks before he lost one. When the exception arrives attached to the best war record in the field, that is worth writing down, even if one result cannot carry an argument.

What to watch between now and November

Wisconsin’s third is the race that matters, and it runs 83 days from Tuesday. Watch whether Cooke takes Van Orden on over defense or steps around it. Stepping around is the smarter play. It also gives up ground in a district full of veterans.

Watch the Minnesota general for the reverse question. Neither Tafoya nor Flanagan has served. So the variable is simply gone from a close statewide race in a state with a lot of veterans. If the seat stays tight with neither candidate able to reach for a uniform, that tells us how much the uniform was ever carrying.

Last, watch whether any national veterans group spends on Cooke. She has the most to gain from a fight about military records and the least standing to start one. If the groups show up anyway, that tells us whether they back veterans or back seats.

Track the veteran matchups through November

We follow which party is banking the service record, what it buys at each stage of a campaign, and where the evidence cuts against us. More from our coverage.

Leave a Reply

Latest Strategy Updates